New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA) Search NE-AUA
New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Town Meetings
  Awards
  Members Only
  Member Directory
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Career Opportunities
  Urology Programs
  Links
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
 

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Intermediate and High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Dragan Golijanin, MD, Ralph Madeb, MD, Raymond Rosenbaum, MD, Erdal Erturk, MD, Jean Joseph, MD.
University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.

Background:
Patients with intermediate/high risk localized prostate cancer remain a challenge with significant potential for primary treatment failure. Multiple methods have been developed for risk grouping, including probability tables, artificial neural networks and predictive nomograms. After patients’ stratification into low, intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer, we retrospectively assessed the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in patients with intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer.
Methods:
Between July 2003 and April 2005, 298 patients were treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Patients were categorized into risk groups, including intermediate risk: PSA 10 to 20 ng/ml, or Gleason sum 7, or secondary Gleason 4 or 5, or clinical stage T2b/c and high risk: PSA greater than 20 ng/ml, or Gleason sum greater than 7, or primary Gleason 4 or 5, or clinical stage T3a.
Results:
The study cohort included 298 patients, mean age 59.1 (42-76). 197 (66%), 93 (31%) and 8 (3%) were low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. All high risk and 79 (85%) of intermediate risk patients underwent bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.The mean operating time was 180 minutes (118-486), and the mean blood loss 208ml (25-1500). Average hospital stay was 1.3 days (0.4 to 3 days). Biochemical progression-free survival was in intermediate and high risk group 89% and 50% respectively. At 1, 3, and 6 months, the continence rates were 56%, 93%, and 96%, respectively. The potency rate was 60%.
Conclusions:
In our experience, robot-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in patients with intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer offered favorable oncologic and functional outcomes with decreased morbidity.
Table 1.
Clinico-pathological characteristic of 101 intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer patients treated by robot-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and oncological outcome.

Back to Final Program

 

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 New England Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.