New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA) Search NE-AUA
New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Town Meetings
  Awards
  Members Only
  Member Directory
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Career Opportunities
  Urology Programs
  Links
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
 

Prone Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Benjamin Davies, MD, Erin Gibbons, MD, Stephen Jackman.
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Background: The prone laparoscopic approach to the kidney has been described in the pediatric urologic literature. However, there are no reports of adult prone laparoscopic renal surgery. We present here, a video, of the initial prone laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Methods:The patient was placed in the prone position. Retroperitoneal access was obtained through a 12mm incision inferior to the medial aspect of the 12th rib and just lateral to the paraspinous muscles. Blunt dissection freed the peritoneum from the psoas. A second 12mm port was placed inferior to the lateral aspect of the 12th rib and a PDB balloon dilator (USSC) was inserted medially to insufflate the retroperitoneum under direct visualization. Dissection of the retroperitoneal space was then completed with the harmonic scalpel and a third port was placed just above the iliac crest lateral to the paraspinous muscles. The tumor and hilum were exposed. After clamping the hilum with a laparoscopic Satinsky, the tumor was excised with laparoscopic scissors under direct visualization. Renal bed biopsies were performed for frozen section analysis. Hemostasis was obtained with the aid of a Vicryl mesh patch and fibrin glue
Results: The patient recovered uneventfully. Operative time was 323 minutes and estimated blood loss 100 cc. Final pathology confirmed a 1.6 cm clear cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins.
Conclusions: The prone position offers good access for select posterior tumors. Limitations of this approach include increased difficulty in converting to an open procedure and the confined retroperitoneal space.

Back to Final Program

 

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 New England Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.