New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA) Search NE-AUA Search Powered by Google 
New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Town Meetings
  Awards
  Members Only
  Member Directory
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Career Opportunities
  Urology Programs
  Links
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
  NE-AUA 2006 Annual Meeting, September 28 - 30, 2006, The Westin Hotel & Rhode Island Convention Center Providence, Rhode Island
Back to Scientific Program
Back to Annual Meeting
Clinical Outcomes of Greenlight Laser (Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate) for Obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Michael R. Hermans, MD, King S. Cofffield, MD.
Scott and White Clinic, Temple, TX,

Background: Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) by Greenlight laser has recently become popular as an alternative to standard transurethral resection of the prostate.We have recently added this treatment modality to our practice and our initial results are presented.
Methods: An IRB approved prospective case series of 105 consecutive men who underwent PVP between September 2004 and March 2006.The men were divided into three groups based upon preoperative bladder management: Group N-catheter free (87 men), Group Y- indwelling Foley catheter (8 men) and Group CIC-performing clean intermittent catheterization (10 men).Preoperative data points obtained were: age, AUA symptom score (IPSS), AUA bother score, Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score,Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), serum creatinine, flow rate,postvoid ultrasound residual urine, and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume.The total number of joules used for vaporization was recorded. Postoperative data points at 6 and 12 months obtained were: AUA symptom score (IPSS), AUA bother score, SHIM score, flow rate, and postvoid ultrasound residual urine.
Results: Data summarized in table.

Situation

Group

IPSS

Bother

SHIM

Flow rate

Residual

Preop

N

21.3

4.03

11.2

8.54 ml/sec

128 ml

 

Y

20.6

5.2

7.6

 

 

 

CIC

23.6

4.4

10.3

 

 

6 month postop

N

6.6

1.36

9.5

14.3 ml/sec

36.2 ml

 

Y

8.7

1.7

22

9.4 ml/sec

67 ml

 

CIC

5

3

 

16.3 ml/sec

195 ml

12 month postop

N

8.6

2.07

9.45

12.2 ml/sec

28.4 ml


Conclusions: PVP was effective in improving all voiding parameters at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Sexual function was maintained and improved significantly for men with indwelling foley catheters.PVP should be considered by all urologists to treat obstructive BPH.


Back to Scientific Program
Back to Annual Meeting

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 New England Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.