New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA) Search NE-AUA Search Powered by Google 
New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Town Meetings
  Awards
  Members Only
  Member Directory
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Career Opportunities
  Urology Programs
  Links
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
  NE-AUA 2006 Annual Meeting, September 28 - 30, 2006, The Westin Hotel & Rhode Island Convention Center Providence, Rhode Island
Back to Scientific Program
Back to Annual Meeting
Site of Semen Collection and Its Effect on Semen Analysis Parameters
Rashmi Shetty, MD, LiAnn Handel, MD, Mark Sigman.
Brown Medical School, Providence, RI,

Background: Many centers require patients to collect semen samples only in an office setting while others allow for semen collection either at home or in the office. There has never been a study to determine if one site yields superior semen parameters than the other and therefore there is currently no standard preference or protocol for the site of semen collection. The purpose of this study is to determine if the site of semen collection effects semen parameters by comparing semen samples collected at home to those collected in the office.
Methods: A prospective cohort study of two groups of patients consisting of those that had collected semen during a work-up for infertility and those that had collected semen for intrauterine insemination (IUI). Patients were included in a group only if they had collected samples both at home and in the office. The semen parameters of those samples collected at home were compared to those collected in the office to determine if there was a statistically significant difference.
Results: 170 male patients who were being evaluated for infertility and 97 men who were collecting semen samples for use in IUI were studied. There was no statistically significant difference in sperm count, sperm motility, total count, or total motile count between those samples collected at home versus those collected in the office in either group of patients.
Conclusion: The site of semen collection, whether at home versus in the office, does not have a clinically significant effect on semen analysis parameters. Therefore patients should be allowed to bring semen samples in from home as long as standard collection guidelines are followed.


Back to Scientific Program
Back to Annual Meeting

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 New England Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.