| |
Validation of the dv-Trainer ®, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery
Back to 77th Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline
Validation of the dv-Trainer ®, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery
Patrick A. Kenney, MD, Matthew F. Wszolek, MD, Justin J. Gould, MD, John A. Libertino, MD, Alireza Moinzadeh, MD. Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Background: Simulation is an established component of laparoscopic training, and may prove to be a valuable tool in robotic surgery. The dv-Trainer ® (Mimic Technologies Inc, Seattle, WA) is a virtual reality simulator for the da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) that is in beta development. We sought to assess the face, content and construct validity of the dv-Trainer. Methods: Medical students, residents, and attending surgeons were enrolled in a prospective, IRB-approved study. All data was de-identified at study outset. Subjects were prospectively categorized as either novice (<10 robotic cases) or expert (≥30 robotic cases). Following a standardized introduction and 10 minutes of practice time, each subject completed two endowrist modules and two needle driving modules in sequence. Performance was recorded using a built-in scoring algorithm. Each subject completed a questionnaire after finishing the modules. Results: The novice group (n=19) was composed of 16% students, 58% residents, and 26% attending surgeons. Novices had operated an average of 1.3 ± 2.2 hours at the da Vinci console prior to using the simulator. On average, experts (n=7) had performed 140 ± 116 robotic cases. Expert robotic surgeons outperformed novices on the simulator in nearly all variables in a pooled data set (Tables 1 and 2). All novices ranked the simulator as a realistic practice format. All experts ranked the simulator as useful for training residents and attendings, and agreed with incorporating the simulator into a residency curriculum. The haptic feedback, virtual reality and instrumentation all achieved acceptability. The needle driving modules did not exceed the acceptability threshold. Conclusions: The dv-Trainer has face, content and construct validity as a virtual reality simulator for the da Vinci Surgical System. Needle driving modules will need to be refined. The dv-Trainer may become a valuable training simulator in robotic surgery.
Table 1. Pooled data (Pick & Place, Pegboard, Dots & Numbers, Suture Sponge) | Novice | Expert | P value | | Total task time (sec) | 269 ± 196 | 139 ± 56 | <0.01 | | Max Force | 6.02 ± 13.52 | 2.71 ± 5.34 | 0.07 | | Max Strain | 4.28 ± 4.80 | 3.56 ± 4.66 | 0.49 | | Total motion (mm) | 2635 ± 1682 | 1674 ± 712 | <0.01 | | Instrument Collisions | 4.9 ± 7.8 | 0.9 ± 1.3 | <0.01 |
Table 2. Pooled data (Pick & Place, Pegboard, Dots & Numbers, Suture Sponge) | Novice | Expert | P value | | Time out of view (sec) | 21 ± 63 | 2 ± 5 | 0.02 | | Time out of center (sec) | 87 ± 104 | 32 ± 36 | <0.01 | | Dropped targets | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0 ± 0 | 0.02 | | Successful targets | 10.8 ± 4.7 | 12.6 ± 3.8 | 0.04 | | Unsuccessful targets | 2.2 ± 3.0 | 2.0 ± 3.1 | 0.72 | | Unattempted targets | 0.3 ± 3.5 | 0 ± 0 | <0.01 |
Back to 77th Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline
|
|