New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA) Search NE-AUA
New England Section of the American Urological Association (NE-AUA)
Home | About Us | Contact Us   
  Home
  Annual Meeting
  Town Meetings
  Awards
  Members Only
  Member Directory
  Newsletters
  Committees
  Career Opportunities
  Urology Programs
  Links
  Visit the AUA
 
  Members Only
  Username
 
  Password
 
   Forgot Password?
 
 

Reported Variation in the Evaluation of Antenatal Hydronephrosis: Results of a Web-Based Survey of Pediatric Urologists

Back to 77th Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline


Reported Variation in the Evaluation of Antenatal Hydronephrosis: Results of a Web-Based Survey of Pediatric Urologists
Michael E. Van Bibber, M.D., Daniel B. Herz, M.D., Paul A. Merguerian, M.D..
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.

Background: There are no guidelines for the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. We hypothesized that even among pediatric urologists there is variability in this area.
Methods: A web-based survey was sent to members of the Urology Section of the AAP and ESPU. Respondents answered questions concerning demographics and practice patterns in the management of antenatal hydronephrosis. Statistical analysis of was done by using the chi-squared test.
Results: Of the 156 respondents 78(50%) were from North America and 62(40%) from Europe. Radiographic factors influenced the decision to obtain further imaging or to use prophylactic antibiotics in around 50% of respondents (Table 1). There was wide variability in the parameters that triggered intervention. The use of prophylactic antibiotics ranged from 3% for antero-posterior pelvic diameter (APD) of <4mm to 70% for APD>10mm; 4% for grade I to 66% for grade IV, and 10% for VUR grade I to 80% for VUR grade V. There was also variability in the postnatal radiographic evaluation with no agreement on the use of US or VCUG greater than 80% for any given SFU grade. North American physicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics for any prenatal hydronephrosis compared to their European counterparts (72% vs. 37%, p < 0.005), and European physicians more likely to be influenced by prenatal pelvic diameter when obtaining post-natal imaging (66% vs. 45%, p=0.015 if unilateral and 53% vs. 34%, p=0.023 if bilateral.)
Table of Contents

    • Table 1

Table 1
YesNo
Unilateral hydronephrosis: Influence of APD on postnatal imaging56%44%
Bilateral hydronephrosis: Influence of APD on postnatal imaging45%55%
Unilateral Hydronephrosis: Obtaining imaging studies if postnatal ultrasound shows resolution48%52%
Bilateral Hydronephrosis : Obtaining imaging studies if postnatal ultrasound shows resolution60%40%
Influence of AP diameter on decision to place on prophylaxis42%58%
Influence of SFU grading on decision to place on prophylaxis48%52%
Influence of reflux grade on decision to place on prophylaxis42%58%
Routine postnatal use of prophylactic antibiotics56%44%
Routine use of antibiotics if postnatal ultrasound is normal17%83%

Conclusions: There is considerable variation in resource utilization, both radiographic and use of prophylactic antibiotics, in the evaluation and treatment of antenatal hydronephrosis even among pediatric urologists. This variability is most probably due to the absence of clear guidelines based on prospective and controlled trials.

Back to 77th Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline

 

 
     
     
Copyright © 2008 New England Section of the American Urological Association. All Rights Reserved.